Vendor evaluation · August 6, 2026

Vetted Health: plausible platform, unverified offer.

A forwarded email offered MNA access to 2,000 pre-vetted travel nurses and allied clinicians. Public evidence supports a real early-stage marketplace, but not the solicitation's specific supply, pricing, or data-rights claims.

Current decision

Conditional Hold

Run a documentation request and controlled demo only. Do not share candidate records, licenses, credentials, facility information, or Pulse access until the domain relationship, legal counterparty, references, credentialing controls, data rights, security posture, and pricing are documented.

Weighted vendor score

2.65/5.0

Conditional hold: relevant product, material evidence gaps

16 daysAge of myvettedhealth.com at review

2.65/5Weighted MNA vendor score

0Solicitation-specific references independently verified

Decision evidence

Why the score is low

Vetted has a coherent public healthcare-recruiting footprint. The remaining risk is whether the new solicitation domain, candidate supply, credentialing process, legal counterparty, and commercial terms are genuinely ready for MNA.

Real operating footprint Positive

The public company profile, employer site, recruiter page, careers page, and travel-job marketplace describe a coherent healthcare recruiting platform with named employees and staffing-company references.

New solicitation domain High risk

myvettedhealth.com was registered on July 20, 2026, only 16 days before the email. It resolves to a minimally rendered page and uses a different domain from the public employer and recruiter pages.

Supply claims need definition Unverified

The email claims 2,000 pre-vetted clinicians, 3+ years of experience, 3-5 candidates on demand, and four years of net-new supply to Cross Country and Triage. No source report, cohort definition, or reference was provided.

Marketplace, not staffing agency

Vetted's public job pages state that Vetted is not the agency and makes warm introductions to underlying staffing companies. MNA must clarify whether this offer is a marketplace subscription, lead service, referral arrangement, or staffing relationship.

Network counts vary

Public pages reference 500,000+ healthcare workers, 1M+ clinicians, and 4M+ clinicians. These may describe different products or time periods, but Vetted should define active records, specialties, geography, freshness, and availability.

Data-use and security gap High risk

The privacy policy describes lead generation and sharing applicant information with staffing agencies and third parties. No public security package, subprocessor list, retention schedule, or incident terms were located.

Commercial model unclear

The careers page describes a $1,000 placement fee, while the recruiter page advertises no cost until hire and free credits. MNA received no pricing, minimum term, replacement policy, or candidate-ownership terms.

Capability fit

Where Vetted could help

Vetted may add candidate reach and sourcing speed. MNA should retain final credential review, candidate consent controls, assignment fit, and production imports.

Candidate sourcing

Vetted may provide access to active travel clinicians and reduce recruiter sourcing time.

Potential

Credentialing packets

MNA must validate licenses, certifications, work history, consent, and assignment fit before submission.

Shared

ATS connectivity

Vetted lists Bullhorn, Salesforce, and LaborEdge integrations. No Pulse data dictionary or tested export was provided.

Unverified

Candidate ownership

MNA needs written rules for duplicates, existing candidates, exclusivity, attribution, conversion fees, and post-termination access.

Unknown

Data governance

MNA should not upload resumes, licenses, credentials, or other sensitive records until security and data-processing terms are approved.

Blocked

Recruiter productivity

Potential value is time saved on sourcing, but success must be measured by qualified submissions, interviews, fills, and cost per qualified submission.

Pilot only

Purchasing question: Does Vetted provide active, consented, travel-ready clinicians at a lower cost and faster time-to-submit than MNA's current sourcing process? The answer requires a redacted sample, written data terms, transparent pricing, and a small pilot.

MNA scoring framework

Weighted scorecard

Weights follow the MNA vendor framework: Operational Fit 30%, Travel Staffing Relevance 20%, ROI 20%, Data Quality 15%, Credibility 10%, and Cost 5%.

Operational Fit

2.5/5

30% weight

Candidate sourcing and ATS connectivity could fit MNA, but no Pulse workflow, export sample, or implementation plan is documented.

Travel Staffing Relevance

3.5/5

20% weight

The public product is centered on travel healthcare jobs and clinician recruiting. The email's specific population and availability remain unverified.

ROI Potential

2.5/5

20% weight

Faster sourcing could help, but no placement rate, fill rate, exclusivity, time-to-submit, or MNA-specific economics are available.

Data Quality

2.5/5

15% weight

Credentialing and license-verification claims are plausible, but no sample dataset, audit evidence, freshness standard, or duplicate process was provided.

Vendor Credibility

2.5/5

10% weight

The company has a coherent public footprint, but it is early-stage/private beta, the solicitation domain is new, and the legal counterparty is unclear.

Cost Effectiveness

1.5/5

5% weight

The email gives no price. Public pages describe both a $1,000 placement fee and no cost until hire/free credits.

System fit

Pulse integration

A manual bridge may be possible, but public ATS claims are not evidence of a Pulse connector. No data dictionary, sample export, API, webhook, or import test was available.

Preliminary score

2/5

Possible manual bridge, but unverified. Adequate only for a controlled test, never production access at this stage.

Only acceptable test path

Receive 10 to 20 synthetic or redacted candidate records in CSV or JSON.
Require specialty, state license, verification date, availability, consent status, duplicate status, and disposition history.
Validate and map fields with the Pulse administrator before any import.
Require written candidate-ownership, deletion, and conversion-fee terms before testing.
Never grant vendor production credentials or upload full credential files during evaluation.

Safety gate

No access to MNA's primary domain, M365, Mailcoach, Pulse, or candidate systems.
No resumes, licenses, credential files, health information, or other sensitive candidate records before security review.
No candidate submission before MNA confirms license, certification, consent, availability, and assignment fit.
No annual agreement, exclusive commitment, or nonrefundable setup fee without verified identity, references, and written data terms.

Required due diligence

Questions before reconsideration

If leadership chooses to continue, answers should be delivered in writing and independently verified before MNA supplies any data or schedules a live integration test.

What is the exact legal entity name, registration number, jurisdiction, contracting address, and authorized signatory?

Is myvettedhealth.com owned and controlled by the same entity as vettedhealth.com? Why was the new domain created?

Provide two independently contactable staffing-company references, including one who can confirm the Cross Country or Triage claim.

Define the 2,000-clinician offer: specialties, states, active availability, experience calculation, verification date, duplicate rate, and exclusivity.

Provide a redacted 10 to 20 record sample with consent, license state, verification date, availability, and disposition history.

Provide a sample credentialing packet and the complete license, background, reference, and expiration-monitoring checklist.

What are all subscription, credit, placement, conversion, replacement, minimum-term, and candidate-ownership terms?

Provide security, data-processing, subprocessor, retention/deletion, breach-notification, and insurance documents.

Explain whether ATS connectivity means a native connector, API, webhook, automation platform, or manual CSV.

Confirm that MNA data will not be used for other agencies and will be deleted or returned at pilot close.

Current recommendation: hold pending diligence.

Vetted Health has a plausible product and relevant market presence, but MNA should not treat this solicitation as an approved candidate-supply relationship until the domain, legal entity, data rights, credentialing controls, pricing, and references are verified.

Re-score after the documentary package and controlled pilot.